#Alisa zinov yevna rosenbaum update#

Even if I was unsure (and it's not clear that I was), I mis-represented my state of knowledge by speaking confidently. I confidently made a false statement about something which I can be reasonably expected to speak accurately about.

I count as a lie the statement of mine in which I said that I didn't have hand soap at my kitchen sink. But when I got home a day later, I saw that I *did* have hand soap at my kitchen sink. The person expressed surprise that I didn't have hand soap at my kitchen sink. I said that I didn't have hand soap in my kitchen sink at home. That was convenient because I needed to wash my hands and the bathroom was on a different floor. I was staying at the house of someone I know. Not too long ago, I had been away from home for about a week. That mistake would be hard to catch with my current process. I need to either follow through with that or retract my claim. At this point, for me, sending a message that I haven't listened to is dishonest, because I've previously stated my intention to use TTS as part of my error-checking process. The issue here was that I didn't listen to my message #13198 before sending it. > that they were giving *me him* reliable info My current best process for generating typo-free text is to check for misspelled words highlighted in red, and use TTS to listen to what I wrote. At work, it would be helpful for me to be able to generate typo-free text, so I am interested to find a trustworthy process for that. For example, in a book, there basically should never be a typo, but in IMs that are clearly being sent off-the-cuff, occasional typos are okay. In different situations there will be different expectations for what counts as reasonable typo-prevention efforts. From the Hell's Kitchen perspective: every factual inaccuracy is like a major problem with a dish, but so long as the true meaning of the text can be easily understood, a typo is more like a tiny defect. I think that typos matter too, but in a different way than factual inaccuracies. #13199 Thanks for the typo reports (and for the content assessment), anon.Īfter figuring out what I wrote above, it's a given for me that I need to find a way to reliably say things without being inaccurate or otherwise lying. It’s misrepresenting your state of knowledge, like a waiter who says that a dish doesn't contain some allergen when in fact he doesn't know or hasn't done adequate due diligence.īig picture: people need to be able to trust what you say, and you can't be trusted if you don't adequately error check what you say. Being in accurate in this way is a form of lying. When you make an assertion without doing adequate unit testing, error checking, or cross-checking, you are saying that you know something which you do not in fact know. Gordon Ramsey noticed that the chef hadn't done sufficient error-checking, and said that he couldn't trust them any more. Once, someone feigned not knowing what was wrong with a dish (it was scallops, and they were raw). I once watched an episode of Hell's Kitchen in which chef Gordon Ramsey indicated that he needed to be able to trust that his chefs were reliable and that they were giving me him reliable info about the dishes that they were cooking.

Beginning of Infinity Website Removed in Protestīeing inaccurate is a matter of morality.

Video: Talking About David Deutsch and Andy B Problems.

#Alisa zinov yevna rosenbaum update#

David Deutsch Harassment Update for September 2021.Writing Critique for 'Community Banking and Fintech'.David Deutsch Harassment Update for November 2021.Analysis of David Deutsch’s The Final Prejudice.Harassment Campaign Update for May 2022.Specialist Creators with Small Audiences.